| Recent
Articles |
Science.gov Embraces Metadata
The 3.0 version of the search engine at Science.gov should demonstrate better
results when it comes to relevance....
RyanAir
Success Has Strong Web Lessons
Despite record fuel prices, Ryanair makes record profits. Its no-frills website
has helped this no-frills airline achieve such phenomenal success...
|
|
|
11.29.05
Newspapers Attack Government
PR
 By
Shel Holtz
Earlier this month I
reported about an editorial in the Contra Costa Times that took the fire department
and board of supervisors to task for spending money on PR agencies during difficult
financial times.
Now, a Florida newspaper has gotten
into the act. The editorial writers at The Stewart News, a Scripps paper,
say, "Martin County needed to get out a lot of information during Hurricane Wilma,
but did it have to spend $17,900 with a local PR firm to get it?"
The brief editorial explains the situation, then expresses the editors' woeful
lack of understanding of what is required in a crisis and what professional PR
counselors do: "Even if the firm spent seven days on the job, how many people
are paid $17,900 for that length of time? The county has people who know how to
answer questions, and who would not be at their regular posts during a storm,
so why didn't it use them?"
Fortunately, one of the two comments posted to the online version of the editorial
asks the same questions I'm inclined to ask:
Does anybody in Martin County actually know what a Public Relations spokesman
does? Do you know what the bill for a PR person would charge in Ft. Lauderdale?
A hell of a lot more than 17K. Complain all you want but remember that this is
a service that counties troughout the nation pay to represent them on TV. What
iff CNN happened to show up in Martin County for a report? Send in some amatuer
to open his mouth an say the wrong thing and embarass the County? THIS is why
you hire a professional. Martin County did the right thing by hiring a professional
PR person.
Allen Myers deserves credit for taking the editors to task for their uninformed
opinion, but the mere publication of the editorial so soon on the heels of the
California example suggests a disturbing trend, all the more confounding considering
how much newspapers depend on PR professionals for a majority of the content they
publish in their own papers. (I've referred here before to a study suggesting
that 80% or more of a newspaper's content originates with a statement, press release,
or contact from a spokesperson of some kind.)
Have you seen other editorials condemning public institutions for hiring PR agencies?
|
