| Recent
Articles |
Austin Paper Offers Blogs To Local Politicos
The Austin American-Statesman has an open offer to host blogs for candidates for office from the Central Texas area. Candidates range in aspiration from county clerk offices to that of Governor or the US...
FTC Busts Online Realtors On Antitrust Case
The Austin Board of Realtors found itself on the receiving end of the Federal Trade Commission's ire due to the FTC's contention the Multiple Listing Service (MLS) used by the Board blocked the marketing of certain listings...
CALEA Argument Scoffed At By Judge
A lawyer for the FCC found a Washington DC appellate
panel skeptical of requests from the Bush Administration for easier wiretapping of online telephone calls...
The CIA Tracking Blogs
It seems that big business are not the only ones
interested in tracking
online blogs, the CIA has launched an initiative to track the blogosphere. As OSC Director Douglas J. Naquin told...
|
 |
| Recent WebProNews Articles |
Time Warner To AOL: See Ya?
AOL may be ready to be sold or otherwise separated from the Time Warner corporate apparatus, and one potential purchaser springs to mind immediately (Hi Google.)
An Alternative To Wikipedia
In a Tuesday press relese, Wikipedia founder Larry Sanger announced plans to launch a rival site to the online encyclopedia. The new wiki project, Citizendium, will draw upon community experts to offer greater reliability...
US Search Rankings: Yeah, Google's First
The numbers released by comScore for top US home, work, and university online users for July through September 2006 showed Google's third quarter search share was as strong as its financial report.
Google WiFi Plans Meet Politics
It sounds like Google's Chris Sacca didn't have a lot of fun at a public discussion of Google and Earthlink plans for wireless broadband in San Francisco. Something for nothing, in this case free WiFi for San Francisco...
Click Fraud Down By 0.3 Percent
The industry average click fraud rate trickled slightly downward in the third quarter according to the Click Fraud Index from ClickForensics; rates for top tier providers like Google and Yahoo fell nearly one percent.
|
 |
|
|
|
10.24.06
Google Involved In Digital Democracy
 By Joe Lewis
The 2006 elections mark a new era in the way that candidates for various political offices are promoting their platforms to the voting public. Google Video, YouTube, and Google Earth are some of the virtual avenues that today's candidates are utilizing to reach out to the Internet voter.
Another November election looms on the horizon, bringing with it the usual media circus that Americans have come to know and expect from these political races. Newspapers, radio, and television will become rife with campaign advertising as candidates attempt to sway voters to their respective partisan constituency.
The Internet, however, could have the most significant impact on the 2006 electoral landscape.
But that influence isn't going to come from the standard campaign material found on the typical candidate's website. Instead, politicians are embracing a new means of engaging the Internet voting demographic…
Online video content.
YouTube and Google Video have long-since been a repository for hours upon hours of video content laden with political satire. In 2006, however, the candidates themselves are looking to carve their own niche in the realm of online video and reach out to digital communities in a new way.
One such man is Mike Bouchard, republican candidate for senate in Michigan.
The Bouchard camp has departed from traditional online campaigning, instead constructing the campaign's website around a blogging-type format and featuring new video content, conveniently hosted by both Google Video and YouTube, on an almost daily basis.
David All, communications director for the Bouchard campaign, asserts that this type of "2.0 approach" is a pivotal factor in the campaign's overall modern media strategy. All goes on to add that hosting the video content for free on Google Video and YouTube "makes financial sense."
This is a growing sentiment among campaign hopefuls in 2006.
Free video hosting, however, is made possible through advertising partnerships. Marketing is the engine that drives the online video machine, but the interjection of politics could create potential conflicts of interest.
For the purposes of debate, let's consider George Orwell Peterson, a fictitious senatorial candidate.Mr. Peterson is a conservative candidate with a platform revolving around issues such as keeping more labor jobs in the United States and strengthening the national economy by encouraging consumers to only purchase American made products instead of buying foreign.
As a voter in Mr. Peterson's district, I peruse his website and see that he has a number of campaign advertisements hosted by Google Video.
In clicking one of the video streams, I am greeted with an advertisement from a company that has recently outsourced a great deal of labor to its overseas division. Then in his advertisement, Mr. Peterson outlines how economically critical it is to keep labor jobs in the United States.
A tad bit confused, I decide to watch another video. This time the campaign message is preceded by an advertisement from a prominent foreign automobile manufacturer. Ironically, Mr. Peterson's message focuses on how vital a role American manufacturing plays in keeping the U.S. economy vibrant.
These are examples of some conflicting messages that could exist between advertising sponsors and political candidates who choose to host video content on Google and YouTube.
How would advertising sponsors react to their ads being liked with campaign messages that could potentially undermine the product?
Let us, however, consider a different scenario. Perhaps a prominent American car manufacturer such as Chevrolet winds up with an advertisement preceding one of Mr. Peterson's campaign videos. Could that send a false message to the voting community that Chevrolet is a sponsor of the Peterson campaign?
Months later, Mr. Peterson is indicted on charges of embezzlement and tax evasion. Does Chevrolet, inadvertently linked with the campaign, suffer a negative backlash as a result of the criminal investigation and subsequent legal proceedings?
Reports are that Google holds a staggering 25% revenue share of online advertising; so it goes without saying that advertising partnerships play a vital role in the company's overall financial success. Could a mix of politics and advertising throw a monkeywrench into the revenue machine?
It is yet unclear if the company has an official position or a policy in place to address such issues. All inquiries to the company's corporate communications department have thus far been unanswered.
About the Author:
Joe is a staff writer for WebProNews. Visit WebProNews for the latest ebusiness news.
|
