|
| Recent
Articles |
Austin Paper Offers Blogs To Local Politicos
The Austin American-Statesman has an open offer to host blogs for candidates for office from the area. Candidates range in aspiration from county clerk offices to that of Governor or the US House of Representatives.
FTC Busts Online Realtors On Antitrust Case
The Austin Board of Realtors found itself on the
receiving end of the Federal Trade Commission's
ire due to the FTC's contention the Multiple Listing
Service (MLS) used by the Board blocked the marketing
of certain listings...
CALEA Argument Scoffed At By Judge
A lawyer for the FCC found a Washington DC appellate panel skeptical of requests from the Bush Administration for easier wiretapping of online telephone calls. Pity Jacob Lewis, attorney for the Federal Communications...
The CIA Tracking Blogs
It seems that big business are not the only ones
interested in tracking
online blogs, the CIA has launched an initiative to track the blogosphere. As OSC Director Douglas J. Naquin told The Washington Times... o
Congress Vote Loses On Net Neutrality
The U.S. House of Representatives Energy and Commerce Committee voted 34-22 against a bill that was supposed to aid in the fight for net neutrality. Blame Joe Barton, Texas Republican congressman who decided this...
States Look To Tax Your Digital Assets Off
More and more states, especially ones with Democrat controlled legislatures, CNet points out, are dipping into the digital media pot by imposing taxes on...
Windows Mobile Wins Big Government Contract
Bink
reports that Microsoft's Windows Mobile has
won a contract from the U.S. Census Bureau for 500,000 handsets, which is expected to increase sales of Windows Mobile devices to $1 billion in one to three years, up from the current $337 million.
Indian Army Sees Threat in Google Earth
The Indian army is a little freaked-out that Google Earth shows satellite images of their strategic installations. Of course, governments around the world didn't already have access to these images until Google Earth. ;-)
|
 |
|
|
|
11.10.06
On Net Neutrality
 By Jason Miller
Jeffrey Hermes, a litigation partner at Boston law firm Brown Rudnick, whom I’ve sourced for a previous article on libel as it applies to podcasting, was a little late responding for an article on how the midterm elections would affect the Network Neutrality debate. Jeff sent a brief essay on the issue as a whole, which brings up some interesting points. To follow is the text of that response.
| Recent WebProBlog Post |
Web Courses Popular With College Students
The advantages to online learning are that colleges have a wider enrollment. The downside to this is the face-to-face contact with the professor, that could be an advantage for the student. Depending on the personality of the professor and the interest in the subject matter.
Visit WebProBlog and contribute your opinion today! | |
From the standpoint of a First Amendment attorney advocating freedom ofspeech and press, the network neutrality debate can be seen as a choicebetween the lesser of two evils created by the looming issue of thepossible incapacity of the Internet to carry all of the speech that isnecessary given the explosion of high-bandwidth content providers.
If you permit the creation of a tiered or other non-neutral network, youcan better allocate limited network resources such that bandwidth isused most efficiently; however, this option raises the possibility thatthe services who enact such a tiered system will create a preferredcustomer program on a for-profit basis that will result in smallercontent providers being forced out of the market and the balkanizationof the Internet as service providers each adopt their “stable” ofpreferred services. There is significant concern that the FCC’s currentposition on network neutrality is not strong enough to prevent this sortof preferred service structure.
On the other hand, even with enforced network neutrality, there is thethreat that financially strong organizations can dominate the availablebandwidth directly, as opposed to through contracts with serviceproviders. Also, by asking the government to pass affirmativeregulations governing network neutrality, it opens up a type of Internetregulation never before seen — an ironic position, given that normallythe plea for regulation is brought by those who seek to restrict, ratherthan enhance, access to channels of communication. Regulation in oneinstance can easily lead to regulation in future instances, with theresult of government interference that most Internet speakers have longsought to avoid.
If Internet bandwidth is considered a dwindling resource, then, as withany dwindling resource, those who are rich and powerful will force outthose who are not, in the absence of some form of superveningregulation. Whether there is a way to create such regulation that doesnot fundamentally alter the nature of the Internet as a generallyunregulated playing field is a very difficult and troubling question.
Of course, the final tenet, a continuation of the one introduced in paragraph three, relies on whether bandwidth is truly finite, especially 10 years down the road, which is, I think, an important distinction. Allow me to interject that the end game is control of the fiber to be laid to American homes in the next decade. Though bandwidth appears limited now, those limits, as Moore’s Law will dictate, will diminish over time. Once it does, note the logos on the sides of the pipes. Many of those pipes will branded with a V, sans the vendetta if no one opposes, lain next to the scarlet letter, who controls the rest.
He who controls the fiber, controls the future. So some protection is in order, I think, to prevent the abuse of those who control the access, and who work for the shareholder above any nation’s citizenry. Fortunately for Net Neutrality proponents, Democrats sweeping Congress is boon to the cause, as their predecessors railed against it at telecom request.
For a haunting metaphoric explanation of what telecom’s intend to make out of the internet, see Bob Frankston’s prose, “Sidewalks: Paying by the Stroll.”
Want to add your thoughts?
As always, visitors of WebProBlog are invited to share their comments, suggestions, ideas, and contributions. Visit WebProBlog and contribute your opinion today! |
|
About the Author:
Jason L. Miller is a staff writer for WebProNews covering technology and business.
|
