|
| Recent
Articles |
Austin Paper Offers Blogs To Local Politicos
The Austin American-Statesman has an open offer to host blogs for candidates for office from the area. Candidates range in aspiration from county clerk offices to that of Governor or the US House of Representatives. A baker's dozen of 13 hopefuls have established blogs at...
FTC Busts Online Realtors On Antitrust Case
The Austin Board of Realtors found itself on the
receiving end of the Federal Trade Commission's
ire due to the FTC's contention the Multiple Listing
Service (MLS) used by the Board blocked the marketing
of certain listings...
CALEA Argument Scoffed At By Judge
A lawyer for the FCC found a Washington DC appellate panel skeptical of requests from the Bush Administration for easier wiretapping of online telephone calls. Pity Jacob Lewis, attorney for the Federal Communications Commission. A trio of federal Circuit judges proved at...
The CIA Tracking Blogs
It seems that big business are not the only ones
interested in tracking
online blogs, the CIA has launched an initiative to track the blogosphere. As OSC Director Douglas J. Naquin told The Washington Times "A lot of blogs now have become very big on the Internet...
Congress Vote Loses Wikipedia Ban In China
The U.S. House of Representatives Energy and Commerce Committee voted 34-22 against a bill that was supposed to aid in the fight for net neutrality. Blame Joe Barton, Texas Republican congressman who decided this...
States Look To Tax Your Digital Assets Off
More and more states, especially ones with Democrat controlled legislatures, CNet points out, are dipping into the digital media pot by imposing taxes on purchased downloads. The provided rationale is to loosen the distinction between tangible and intangible goods.
|
 |
|
|
|
11.17.06
Wikipedia No Longer Banned In China
 By Autumn Davis
Almost one year to the day after the Chinese government placed a ban on both the English and Chinese-language versions of online encyclopedia, Wikipedia, both have been lifted.
As of this week it has been reported that the Chinese government has lifted the ban on the Chinese-language version of Wikipedia. This decision comes only one month after the government lifted the ban from Wikipedia's English-language version in China. Jimmy Wales, founder of Wikipedia said "We don't know what prompted the block and don't know what prompted the unblock."
Created in 2001, Wikipedia "has rapidly grown into the largest reference Web site on the Internet", according to the website's creators. Wikipedia's content is free and users around the world can collaborate on different articles. The website itself is a "wiki", which means that anyone with internet access can correct, edit, or add to any page on the site to improve upon the encyclopedia's information.
The fact that users of the site can contribute their own knowledge and accounts of events may have led to the Chinese ban of Wikipedia in the first place.
Controversial information was made available to the Chinese public which the government did not want them viewing. Some of the material is still being blocked on the site even after the ban was taken off, such as Pro-Democracy articles like the ones from the 1989 movement and massacre in Tiananmen Square.
The Chinese-language Wikipedia website features more than 90, 000 articles, which are contributed mostly by Chinese citizens. However the percentage of Chinese citizens contributing to the site has gone down considerably as a result of the government-approved, more restricted encyclopedia, Baidupedia, which was created by search engine Baidu.
Baidu was, ironically, accused of lifting information from Wikipedia, sifting through only the information that they thought fit for the eyes of the Chinese people.
Baidu's marketing director Bian Jiang claims, "The sharing of information is instrumental in the development and the continuity of knowledge. The act of sifting out relevant information and editing is in itself a process of information packaging,"
To see just how restricted Baidupedia actually is, I visited the site and searched for Tiananmen Square; the search yielded absolutely no results. There is no English-language version of this site, so I translated the entire Chinese-language website.
Wikipedia's Chinese-language site did actually have some information of the Tiananmen Square "incident", as they put it. The information is essentially written to say that some insolent students staged a Democratic protest and were killed; it neglects to mention that the students were un-armed.
Wikipedia is not the only company that had to choose between adhering to the censorship placed on their sites by the Chinese government, or risk losing access to the country all together. Reporters Without Borders has also criticized Yahoo! and Google for "yielding to the Chinese government's censorship requests."
About the Author:
Autmn Davis is a staff writer for WebProNews covering ebusiness and technology.
|
