The FTC Looks Into Antitrust Charges Against Google
Posted by Andy Beal
I canâ€™t quite figure out why the Federal Trade Commission has decided to investigate Google CEO Eric Schmidtâ€™s role on the boards of both Google and Apple.
Is the government truly trying to find a way to bring antitrust charges against Google? It wouldnâ€™t be the first time, would it?
Or, is this simply the FTC “going through the motions” so as to appease those that feel Googleâ€™s too dominant, while using a platformâ€“Section 8 of the Clayton Antitrust Actâ€“thatâ€™s rarely enforced?
Iâ€™m leaning towards the latter, for a number of reasons.
First, Eric Schmidt was recently named to Presidentâ€™s Obamaâ€™s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology (PCAST). Sure, Obama wants to send a message that there are no “free passes” in his administration, but forcing Schmidt off the Apple board is hardly a victory for those against corporate conspiracies.
Second, the overlap between Google and Apple is somewhat minor and certainly not in an area that warrants antitrust concerns. The two companies compete in the mobile space, but neither are monopolizing in this areaâ€“although both could be within the next 5 years. If Apple were a major player in the search space, then I could see the FTCâ€™s motivation.
Lastly, if weâ€™re to believe the New York Times, Section 8 is rarely actioned on by the government, so if this is a legitimate attempt to keep Googleâ€™s footprint contained, then itâ€™s a poor one.
What do you think? Is the government sharpening its swords or toothpicks?
About the Author: Andy Beal is an internet marketing consultant and considered one of the world's most respected and interactive search engine marketing experts. Andy has worked with many Fortune 1000 companies such as Motorola, CitiFinancial, Lowes, Alaska Air, DeWALT, NBC and Experian. You can read his internet marketing blog at Marketing Pilgrim and reach him at firstname.lastname@example.org.