<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>IT Gov News - News For The IT Professional &#187; Mike Moran</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.itgovnews.com/author/mike-moran/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.itgovnews.com</link>
	<description>News For The IT Professional</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 12:30:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>FTC Demands Full Disclosure From Bloggers</title>
		<link>http://www.itgovnews.com/2009/12/22/ftc-demands-full-disclosure-from-bloggers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.itgovnews.com/2009/12/22/ftc-demands-full-disclosure-from-bloggers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 13:30:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike Moran</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.itgovnews.com/?p=82</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m still struggling with the whole full disclosure thing from the FTC. It&#8217;s not that I disagree with it&#8211;in fact, I think I have been following their guidelines all along. But now I feel like I really need to watch myself or I&#8217;m going to jail. All this was brought to mind when Mashable featured [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m still struggling with the whole full disclosure thing from the FTC. It&#8217;s not that I disagree with it&#8211;in fact, I think I have been following their guidelines all along. But now I feel like I really need to watch myself or I&#8217;m going to jail. All this was brought to mind when <a href="http://mashable.com/2009/12/16/telstra-social-media/">Mashable</a> featured the work that Converseon [full disclosure: I am Converseon's Chief Strategist] client Telstra [full disclosure: I have tangentially worked on the Telstra account for Converseon] did to <a href="http://exchange.telstra.com.au/2009/12/17/telstra-launches-interactive-3rs-social-media-learning-module/">publicize its social media guidelines with an interactive learning module</a> [full disclosure: oh wait, I don't think I need to say anything this time].</p>
<p><span id="more-82"></span></p>
<p>I think the thing that annoys me the most is that it really screws up a decent story to constantly be disclosing. It feels like the blogging equivalent of TMI (my daughter has explained to me that means &#8220;too much information&#8221;).</p>
<p>So, I&#8217;d like to tell you the story about what Telstra did. Not because they are a Converseon client, but because it is cool. And this isn&#8217;t a story that shills for Converseon, because Converseon didn&#8217;t create this cool learning module. Converseon didn&#8217;t create the content. [Full disclosure: Telstra is a Converseon client and Converseon did provide advice for this project.] But it&#8217;s safer for you to scroll back up and read the Mashable story or Telstra&#8217;s own blog post and look at the module yourself.</p>
<p>The truth is that Telstra is a Converseon client but they are a really smart client. The story is not about Converseon&#8211;it&#8217;s about Telstra. They wanted to do this and they did it. It&#8217;s only the FTC that causes me tell this story mentioning the name Converseon more than Telstra because I don&#8217;t want anyone to think that I am trying to shill Converseon. I think it is a more honest and more compelling story if Converseon were never mentioned.</p>
<p>But I know that is unrealistic. I know that even without the FTC rules, I would have disclosed that Telstra is a Converseon client and that I work for Converseon. And I&#8217;m not sure what to do about that. I know that openness and transparency and full disclosure are all good. I know that it&#8217;s important for readers to understand all the relationships and entanglements of the blogger to be able to evaluate the credibility of the information from that blogger. And I don&#8217;t even begrudge the FTC&#8217;s rules&#8211;everyone isn&#8217;t as scrupulous about this stuff as I have been, I know.</p>
<p>But I do miss just being able to tell a good story, even if I happen to know the story because I work with the subject of the story. Instead, I wait for Mashable to tell the story so that when I bring it up it has Mashable&#8217;s credibility, in case you doubt mine in this situation.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know what to do about any of this. I am just noticing that we are losing something here and I don&#8217;t think we are going to get it back.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.mikemoran.com/biznology/archives/2009/12/full_disclosure_to_the_ftc_we.html">Comments</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.itgovnews.com/2009/12/22/ftc-demands-full-disclosure-from-bloggers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
